well, I thought this was an interesting book. So if I were to add another page, it would probably be a little bit more optimistic. And it would look something like this:
Monday, February 25, 2013
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Thoughts on Lolita
Lolita is an interesting
book because it deals with something that crosses far beyond the threshold of
taboo, and yet it does it so skillfully and eloquently that the reader often
forgets exactly what the book is about, which is a somewhat psychotic
pedophile who is also a pathological liar. The only problem is, he’s really
good at what he does—so good that the reader, if not primed to mistrust this
man, may not realize that the contents of his “journal” are not coming from a
trustworthy source. Of course, I’m talking about Humbert, in this case, not the
author.
The narrator goes to such
lengths to try to prove his innocence, but then he says things like, “I did not
plan to marry poor Charlotte in order to eliminate her in some vulgar, gruesome
and dangerous manner such as killing her by placing five bichloride-of-mercury
tablets in her preprandial sherry or anything like that…” It completely throws
the reader off and he’s slowly comes to realize that this narrator is either
toying with us as he does with the psychiatrists, or he really does have a mental
problem that can make him quite dangerous. It’s an amusing little dance he does
between revealing what I imagine is his true self, and a masked version of his character
that he uses to stay as presentable as possible for an audience that may be
responsible for his fate.
What I really found quite
unique to this book was that as I read it, I registered that the narrator was a
little insane and had serious problems, but it was only when I started
listening to the audiobook that I realized just how deep Humbert’s issues are.
There was something about the way the voice actor talked that made it sound
like he sincerely believed and agreed with the things he was saying—especially
the parts where he laboriously pronounces Dolores’s pet name, “Lo-lee-ta.” I
actually liked the story more when I was listening to it than when I was
reading it. As I was reading, it just seemed like I was a passive observer—not
even an observer, more like a secondhand listener being told a story from
someone who heard it from someone else. When I listened to the audiobook, It
felt like I was right there in the room with Humbert as he told me about his
fetish for little girls and of his adopted daughter whom he has sex with
repeatedly. It’s so much more visceral and it makes the detailed a thousand times
more difficult to ignore.
I like
that Humbert really tries to justify his actions. He does not deny them.
Instead, he reasons that he does not do any harm with his lust for nymphets.
Also, according to Humbert, why does it even matter when the romans would
molest twelve-year-old boys and holy figures would be wed to wives who had not
even hit puberty yet? To him, there was nothing wrong with what he did, and
that’s what made the book so interesting—it was from a perspective so utterly
unlike my own, I have to suspend my disbelief to unprecedented levels just to
get through it.
Monday, February 4, 2013
Conan the Warrior
Conan the Warrior
One thing I kept noticing was that Robert E. Howard went into
very lengthy descriptions about the characters and the landscape he was
introducing. Also, it seemed that he took every opportunity to make the
characters as sexy as possible. When Conan laughs, he flexes his bicep for
appeal. When he looks at Valeria, he pays particular attention to her large
breasts and hips. You can just imagine how the scene would unfold in a
movie—very little gets left to the imagination. The two main characters are
beautiful beyond compare because they are the perfect man and woman (so it
would seem) with no real flaws, except quickness to violence and occasional
rash decision-making, both of which are still pretty attractive attributes. It
seems that this short book was made the same way a sitcom would be made
today—by which I mean it serves no real purpose but to entertain. No big ideas
get thrown around, no morals are questions, and everything is pretty black and
white. It’s just a book about two nearly superhuman characters messing around
in a dangerous town and fighting off monsters and men alike with almost
reckless abandon.
All in all, it certainly knows how to be entertaining. I
completely understand the necessity for such literature. I also noticed that
just about everything I’d consider cliché in today’s writing is a constant presence in Conan the Warrior: Women who move with the quickness of a cat and
men who have bulging muscles just about everywhere. It’s one giant mixing pot
of the things that gave birth to today’s genre literature.
Another thing I noticed was that Howard gives incredible
details to little things like belts and clothes. He pays very close attention
to how the clothes fall on the person wearing them—especially if the form
underneath is still discernable through the clothes. This appears to be exactly the thing
that many people would want to read about because such beautiful people simply
don’t exist in real life and being able to get such an accurate description of
what one looks like is just as good as seeing a celebrity or a 3d model of an
incredibly attractive hero rendered on screen—and thousands of people pay to
see that every day. Perhaps I'm over-simplifying it, but this is just how it seems to me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)